The argument of this paper focus on a critical analysis of the effects recognized to the termination for default. It questions some of them, i.e., the retroactivity and the rules applicable to this institution. The paper pretends to show that there is a gap to fill and this can be made by general principles of civil law. Specifically, the principle of unjust enrichment. This solution is according with the current view that sees resolution as a remedy.
CITATION STYLE
Alonzo, C. C. M. (2016). Una revisión crítica de los efectos de la resolución por incumplimiento y una propuesta de solución. Ius et Praxis, 22(1), 271–321. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122016000100009
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.