Finding the right way for interrupting people improving their sitting posture

57Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, we present three different ways of interrupting people to posture guidance. We developed an ergonomically adjustable office chair equipped with four sensors measuring the office worker's posture. It is important that users do some training after bad posture and be alerted of this; therefore, we implemented three different alert modalities (Graphical Feedback, Physical Feedback, and Vibrotactile Feedback), with the goal to find out which of the techniques is the most effective interruption modality without causing a huge disruption effect. To measure the task-performance, we conducted a formal user study. Our user study results show there are different effects on performance and disruptiveness caused by the three interruption techniques. While the vibrotactile feedback might have higher information awareness benefits at the beginning, it causes a huge intrusion side-effect. Thus, the physical feedback was rated less disruptive to the workflow as the other two feedback modalities. © 2011 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haller, M., Richter, C., Brandl, P., Gross, S., Schossleitner, G., Schrempf, A., … Inami, M. (2011). Finding the right way for interrupting people improving their sitting posture. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6947 LNCS, pp. 1–17). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23771-3_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free