Advances in qualitative decision theory: Refined rankings

8Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A qualitative counterpart of Von Neumann and Morgenstern's Expected Utility Theory was proposed by Dubois and Prade in the mid nineties. In this decision theory uncertainty is assumed to be of a possibilistic nature and decisions can be ranked, via their associated possibility distributions on consequences, according to two qualitative criteria, one pessimistic and one optimistic. However, it may the case that the ranking induced by one of these criteria does not result in a total ordering of the decisions and it can be very interesting to refine the ranking by means of considering another criterion. In this paper we consider some natural refinements and provide the axiomatic characterization of the preference orderings induced by them. © Springer-Verlag 2000.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dubois, D., Godo, L., Prade, H., & Zapico, A. (2000). Advances in qualitative decision theory: Refined rankings. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1952 LNAI, pp. 427–436). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44399-1_44

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free