Abstract
Converging evidence suggests that representations of number, space, and other dimensions depend on a general representation of magnitude. However, it is unclear whether there exists a privileged relation between certain magnitude dimensions or if all continuous magnitudes are equivalently related. Four-year-old children and adults were tested with three magnitude comparison tasks – nonsymbolic number, line length, and luminance – to determine whether individual differences in sensitivity are stable across dimensions. A Weber fraction (w) was calculated for each participant in each stimulus dimension. For both children and adults, accuracy and w values for number and line length comparison were significantly correlated, whereas neither accuracy nor w was correlated for number and luminance comparison. However, although line length and luminance comparison performance were not correlated in children, there was a significant relation in adults. These results suggest that there is a privileged relation between number and line length that emerges early in development and that relations between other magnitude dimensions may be later constructed over the course of development.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Starr, A., & Brannon, E. M. (2015). Developmental Continuity in the Link Between Sensitivity to Numerosity and Physical Size. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 1(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v1i1.2
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.