Is cognitive behavioral therapy a better choice for women with postnatal depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis

78Citations
Citations of this article
323Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study evaluated the combined effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for postnatal depression. A systematic search was conducted across databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessing CBT versus control for postnatal depression until March 2017. Data was extracted by two reviewers, independently. The Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 11.0 were used to calculate the synthesized effect of CBT on depression, and anxiety. A total of 20 RCTs involving 3623 participants were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that CBT was associated with a better Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) than control in short-term (mean difference = -2.86, 95% CI: -4.41-1.31; P<0.05) and long-term (mean difference = -1.68, 95% CI: -1.81-1.56; P<0.05). CBT also improved short-term (mean difference = -6.30, 95% CI: -11.32-1.28; P<0.05) and long-term (mean difference = -4.31, 95% CI: -6.92-1.70; P<0.05) Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Subgroup analysis based on intervention types showed that in-home and telephone-based therapy exhibited significant reductions in EPDS scores (P<0.05 for all). CBT significantly improved the short-term [odds ratio (OR) = 6.57, 95% CI: 1.84-23.48; P<0.05] and long-term (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.61-2.48; P<0.05) depressive symptomatology as compared to control. CBT also reduced the score of Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), though without significance. In conclusion, CBT effectively improved the symptoms and progression of postnatal depression.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, L., Zhao, Y., Qiang, C., & Fan, B. (2018). Is cognitive behavioral therapy a better choice for women with postnatal depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205243

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free