Best Practices in Physics-Based Fault Rupture Models for Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nuclear Installations: Introduction

5Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Inspired by the first workshop on Best Practices in Physics-Based Fault Rupture Models for Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nuclear Installations (BestPSHANI) conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on 18–20 November, 2015 in Vienna (http://www-pub.iaea.org/iaeameetings/50896/BestPSHANI), this PAGEOPH topical volume collects several extended articles from this workshop as well as several new contributions. A total of 17 papers have been selected on topics ranging from the seismological aspects of earthquake cycle simulations for source-scaling evaluation, seismic source characterization, source inversion and ground motion modeling (based on finite fault rupture using dynamic, kinematic, stochastic and empirical Green’s functions approaches) to the engineering application of simulated ground motion for the analysis of seismic response of structures. These contributions include applications to real earthquakes and description of current practice to assess seismic hazard in terms of nuclear safety in low seismicity areas, as well as proposals for physics-based hazard assessment for critical structures near large earthquakes. Collectively, the papers of this volume highlight the usefulness of physics-based models to evaluate and understand the physical causes of observed and empirical data, as well as to predict ground motion beyond the range of recorded data. Relevant importance is given on the validation and verification of the models by comparing synthetic results with observed data and empirical models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dalguer, L. A., Fukushima, Y., Irikura, K., & Wu, C. (2017, September 1). Best Practices in Physics-Based Fault Rupture Models for Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nuclear Installations: Introduction. Pure and Applied Geophysics. Birkhauser Verlag AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1673-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free