A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors

  • Autry K
  • Levine W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research suggests that the presence of a non-referent from the same category as the referent interferes with anaphor resolution. In five experiments, the hypothesis that multiple non-referents would produce a cumulative interference effect (i.e., a fan effect) was examined. This hypothesis was supported in Experiments 1A and 1B, with subjects being less accurate and slower to recognize referents (1A) and non-referents (1B) as the number of potential referents increased from two to five. Surprisingly, the number of potential referents led to a decrease in anaphor reading times. The results of Experiments 2A and 2B replicated the probe-recognition results in a completely within-subjects design and ruled out the possibility that a speeded-reading strategy led to the fan-effect findings. The results of Experiment 3 provided evidence that subjects were resolving the anaphors. These results suggest that multiple non-referents do produce a cumulative interference effect; however, additional research is necessary to explore the effect on anaphor reading times.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Autry, K. S., & Levine, W. H. (2014). A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00818

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free