Effect of high-versus low-volume saline administration on acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery

7Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Fluid resuscitation is critical to perioperative maintenance of adequate preload and cardiac output after cardiac surgery. Liberal use of saline, however, is reportedly associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. This study examined the effects of high-versus low-volume saline administration on AKI after cardiac surgery. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 1,740 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery over a 2-year period. The patients were divided into high-volume saline (n=328, 18.8%) and low-volume saline (n=1,412, 81.2%) groups based on the amount of saline (>1 or ≤1 L, respectively) administered during the first 48 postoperative hours. Results: AKI, the primary outcome, was defined according to the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage classification. There were no significant differences in the incidence of AKI (P=0.46), new renal replacement therapy (RRT) (P=0.39), and early mortality (P=0.52) between the 2 groups. Adjustment of baseline characteristics using propensity score matching showed that high-volume of saline administration was not significantly associated with an increased risk of AKI (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.77-1.93; P=0.38), new RRT (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.68-2.28; P=0.45), or early mortality (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.48-2.02; P=0.97). These results were validated by further adjustments for significant covariates. Conclusions: High-volume administration of saline in the period following cardiac surgery was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of AKI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lim, J. Y., Kang, P. J., Jung, S. H., Choo, S. J., Chung, C. H., Lee, J. W., & Kim, J. B. (2018). Effect of high-versus low-volume saline administration on acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(12), 6753–6762. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.10.113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free