Betting your life: An argument against certain advance directives

32Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the last decade the use of advance directives or living wills has become increasingly common. This paper is concerned with those advance directives in which the user opts for withdrawal of active treatment in a future situation where he or she is incompetent to consent to conservative management but when that incompetence is potentially reversible. This type of directive assumes that the individual is able accurately to determine the type of treatment he or she would have adopted had he or she been competent in this future scenario. The paper argues that this assumption is flawed and provides theoretical and empirical evidence for this. If the assumption is false, and those taking out advance directives do not realise this, then the ethical bases for the use of these advance directives - the maximisation of the individual's autonomy and minimisation of harm - are undermined. The paper concludes that this form of advance directive should be abolished.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ryan, C. J. (1996). Betting your life: An argument against certain advance directives. Journal of Medical Ethics, 22(2), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.22.2.95

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free