Development of Risky Decision Making: Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Neurobiological Perspectives

72Citations
Citations of this article
122Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Developmental differences in mental representations of choices, reward sensitivity, and behavioral inhibition (self-control) explain greater susceptibility to risk taking. Ironically, relying on precise representations in reasoning promotes greater risk taking, but this reliance declines as adolescents mature. This phenomenon is known as a developmental reversal; it is called a reversal because it violates traditional developmental expectations of greater cognitive complexity with maturation. Fuzzy-trace theory (FTT) predicts reversals by proposing two types of mental representation (gist and verbatim), and that risk takers rely more on verbatim processing when making decisions. In this article, we describe the main tenets of FTT and explain how it can account for risky decision making. We also explore the neural underpinnings of development and decision making in the context of distinctions from FTT. FTT's predictions elucidate unanswered questions about risk taking, providing directions for research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reyna, V. F., Wilhelms, E. A., Mccormick, M. J., & Weldon, R. B. (2015). Development of Risky Decision Making: Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Neurobiological Perspectives. Child Development Perspectives, 9(2), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free