Comparing the relation between star formation and galaxy mass in different environments

132Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Analyzing 24 μm MIPS/Spitzer data and the [O II]3727 line of a sample of galaxies at 0.4 ≤ z ≤ 0.8 from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey, we investigate the ongoing star formation rate (SFR) and the specific star formation rate (SSFR) as a function of stellar mass in galaxy clusters and groups, and compare these with results from field studies. As for the field, we find a decline in SFR with time, indicating that star formation (SF) was more active in the past, and a decline in SSFR as galaxy stellar mass increases, showing that the current SF contributes more to the fractional growth of low-mass galaxies than high-mass galaxies. However, we find a lower median SFR (by a factor of ∼ 1.5) in cluster star-forming galaxies than in the field. The difference is highly significant when all Spitzer and emission-line galaxies are considered, regardless of color. It remains significant at z > 0.6 after removing red emission-line galaxies, to avoid possible active galactic nucleus contamination. While there is overlap between the cluster and field SFR-mass relations, we find a population of cluster galaxies (10%-25%) with reduced SFR for their mass. These are likely to be in transition from star forming to passive. Separately comparing clusters and groups at z > 0.6, only cluster trends are significantly different from the field, and the average cluster SFR at a given mass is ∼ two times lower than the field. We conclude that the average SFR in star-forming galaxies varies with galaxy environment at a fixed galaxy mass. © 2010. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vulcani, B., Poggianti, B. M., Finn, R. A., Rudnick, G., Desai, V., & Bamford, S. (2010). Comparing the relation between star formation and galaxy mass in different environments. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 710(1 PART 2). https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/710/1/L1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free