Thermobarometric constraints on pressure variations across the Plattengneiss shear zone of the Eastern Alps: Implications for exhumation models during Eoalpine subduction

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Forward and inverse mineral equilibria modelling of metapelitic rocks in the hangingwall and footwall of the Plattengneiss, a major shear zone in the Eastern Alps, is used to constrain their tectonometamorphic evolution and assess models for their exhumation. Forward (pseudosection) modelling of two metapelitic rocks suggests a steep clockwise P-T path with a near-isothermal decompression segment from a pressure peak at ~18-19 kbar and 670 °C to the metamorphic peak at 680-720 °C and 11-13 kbar. A subsequent decrease to 600-645 °C and 8-9 kbar is inferred from the late growth of staurolite in some samples. Conventional thermobarometric calculations (inverse modelling) on 18 samples with the inferred peak assemblage garnet + plagioclase + muscovite + biotite + quartz + rutile ± ilmenite ± kyanite are associated with large 2σ uncertainties, and absolute pressures calculated for all samples are statistically indistinguishable. However, calculations constraining relative pressure differences (ΔP) between samples sharing a common mineral assemblage are associated with much smaller uncertainties and yield pressure differences that are statistically meaningful. Although the overall pattern is complicated, the results suggest a pressure gradient of up to 3 kbar across the shear zone that is consistent with volume loss and a model of exhumation related to slab extraction for the Plattengneiss shear zone. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eberlei, T., Johnson, T. E., White, R. W., Roffeis, C., & Stüwe, K. (2014). Thermobarometric constraints on pressure variations across the Plattengneiss shear zone of the Eastern Alps: Implications for exhumation models during Eoalpine subduction. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 32(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmg.12069

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free