Investigation of microbial coinfection in 453 septic COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital; a retrospective study

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: We evaluated the rate of COVID-19 microbial coinfection in an Iranian population. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective observational study, we evaluated 453 septic COVID-19 patients for possible coinfection in an Iranian hospital. Results: Overall, 211 (46.57%) cases died due to COVID-19 complications. Positive respiratory secretion and blood cultures were reported in 99 (21.9%) and 19 (4.2%) cases. Klebsiella species were the most commonly isolated microorganisms in respiratory (n = 50, 50.5%) and blood (n = 10, 52.6%) specimens. After adjustment for underlying disorders, positive respiratory microbial cultures significantly increase the odds of developing death, intubation, and ICU admission and negatively impact healthy discharge (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Coinfections with bacteria and fungi independently contribute to poor outcomes in septic COVID-19 patients. Plain language summary COVID-19 bacterial/fungal coinfection is associated with severe mortality rates as it complicates the primary viral infection. This study evaluated 453 patients admitted to an Iranian hospital with COVID-19 and concomitant sepsis for microbial coinfection. A total of 99 (21.9%) cases had positive respiratory secretion cultures, and 19 (4.2%) had positive blood cultures. Klebsiella species were the most commonly yielded microorganism in both respiratory (n = 50, 50.5%) and blood (n = 10, 52.6%) specimens. Bacterial and fungal microbial coinfection are independent determinants of poor outcomes in septic COVID-19 cases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khavandegar, A., Siami, Z., Goudarzi, S., Rasooli, A., & Ettehad, Y. (2023). Investigation of microbial coinfection in 453 septic COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital; a retrospective study. Future Science OA, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.2144/fsoa-2023-0066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free