Use of hot KCl-NH4-N to estimate fertilizer N requirements

24Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We need an easy-to-use chemical index for estimating the amount of N that becomes available during the growing season, to improve N use efficiency. This paper discusses how producers may, in future, use crop growth models that incorporate indices of soil N availability, to make more accurate, risk-sensitive estimates of fertilizer N requirements. In a previous study, we developed an equation, using 42 diverse Saskatchewan soils, that related potentially mineralizable N (N(o)) to NH4-N extracted with hot 2 M KCl (X), (i.e., N(o) = 37.7 + 7.7X, r2 = 0.78). We also established that the first order rate constant (k) for N mineralization at 35°C is indeed a constant for arable prairie soils (k = 0.067 wk-1). We modified the N submodel of CERES-wheat to include k and N(o) (values of N(o) were derived from the hot KCl test). With long-term weather data (precipitation and temperature) as input this model was used to estimate probable N mineralization during a growing season and yield of wheat (grown on fallow or stubble), in response to fertilizer N rates at Swift Current. The model output indicated that the amount of N mineralized in a growing season for wheat on fallow was similar to that for wheat on stubble, as we hypothesized. Further the model indicated that rate of fertilizer N had only minimal effect on N mineralized. We concluded that, despite the importance of knowing the N(min) capability of a soil, it is available water, initial levels of available N and rate of fertilizer N that are the main determinants of yield in this semiarid environment. The theoretical approach we have proposed must be validated under field conditions before it can be adopted for use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Campbell, C. A., Jame, Y. W., Jalil, A., & Schoenau, J. (1997). Use of hot KCl-NH4-N to estimate fertilizer N requirements. In Canadian Journal of Soil Science (Vol. 77, pp. 161–166). Agricultural Institute of Canada. https://doi.org/10.4141/S96-106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free