Either-or: The narrative of "crisis" in Weimar Germany and in historiography

51Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The notion of "crisis" plays an important role in both the history of the Weimar Republic and the historiography on this period of German history. Modifying Max Horkheimer's famous dictum on the intrinsic connection between capitalism and fascism, one might even say that anyone who does not want to talk about "crisis" should remain silent about Weimar Germany. In the brief period between 1918 and 1933 Germany not only had to cope with the consequences of World War I and the Versailles Treaty, but also it was struck by two severe economic crises. Moreover, strong political forces relentlessly tried to overcome the unpopular democratic political system. After the National Socialists finally succeeded in overthrowing the republic, Weimar came to be conceptualized as the ill-born precursor of National Socialism, as the critical stage of German history before the establishment of a rule of terror that intentionally led into the most devastating war in human history. This perspective on the failure of Germany's first democracy stems largely from the dominance of National Socialism as a negative point of reference in historical as well as public debates in the Federal Republic. Copyright © Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Graf, R. (2010, December). Either-or: The narrative of “crisis” in Weimar Germany and in historiography. Central European History. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008938910000725

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free