Effect of percutaneous coronary intervention on quality of life: A consensus statement from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions

41Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreases ischemic complications of acute coronary syndromes. The benefits of PCI in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) depend on its effect on quality of life (QoL), including angina, physical activity, and emotional well-being. PCI decreases angina and the need for anti-anginal medications, and increases exercise capacity and QoL, compared with baseline status and compared with medical therapy without PCI. These benefits are greater when QOL is markedly impaired by severe angina before the procedure. When considering treatment options for symptomatic SIHD, physicians should consider and provide objective data regarding QoL effects for each treatment strategy. QoL outcomes should be considered in clinical trials, appropriate use criteria, practice guidelines, and reimbursement policies for PCI. Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blankenship, J. C., Marshall, J. J., Pinto, D. S., Lange, R. A., Bates, E. R., Holper, E. M., … Chambers, C. E. (2013, February). Effect of percutaneous coronary intervention on quality of life: A consensus statement from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24376

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free