Expertise Elevates AI Usage: Experimental Evidence Comparing Laypeople and Professional Artists

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Generative AI’s novel capacities raise questions about the future role of human expertise: does it level the playing field between professional artists and laypeople, or does expertise enhance AI use? Do visual art skills transfer to these tools? This pre-registered study experimentally compares 50 active professional visual artists with a matched laypeople sample. Two tasks assessed copying accuracy and creative thinking, using a bespoke platform powered by text-to-image AI. Results show expertise transfer: artists produced more accurate copies and more divergent ideas. This advantage remained small but detectable even in this tightly controlled experimental setting. We also explored how well a vision-capable LLM (GPT-4o) would fare: on par in copying and slightly better on average than artists in creativity, although never above best humans. These findings highlight the importance of integrating artistic skills with AI, suggesting a potential for collaborative synergy that could reshape creative industries and arts education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eisenmann, T. F., Karjus, A., Canet Sola, M., Brinkmann, L., Supriyatno, B. I., & Rahwan, I. (2026). Expertise Elevates AI Usage: Experimental Evidence Comparing Laypeople and Professional Artists. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2669041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free