Systematic Use of Visual Analysis for Assessing Outcomes in Single Case Design Studies

139Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Single case designs (SCDs) allow researchers to objectively evaluate the impact of an intervention by repeatedly measuring a dependent variable across baseline and intervention conditions. Rooted in baseline logic, SCDs evaluate change over time, with each participant serving as his or her own control during the course of a study. Formative and summative evaluation of data is critical to determining causal relations. Visual analysis involves evaluation of level, trend, variability, consistency, overlap, and immediacy of effects within (baseline and intervention) and between conditions (baseline to intervention). The purpose of this paper is to highlight the process for visually analysing data collected in the context of a SCD and to provide structures and procedures for evaluating the six data characteristics of interest. A checklist with dichotomous responses (i.e., yes/no) is presented to facilitate implementation and reporting of systematic visual analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ledford, J. R., Lane, J. D., & Severini, K. E. (2018). Systematic Use of Visual Analysis for Assessing Outcomes in Single Case Design Studies. Brain Impairment, 19(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2017.16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free