Could chest X-ray screening for lung cancer be cost-effective?

14Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Currently, no screening program for lung cancer is advocated, yet recent review of the clinical trials has raised questions about the conclusion that it would not be effective. If a screening program is to be considered, its potential economic impact needs to be assessed. METHODS. An economic model was created comparing lung cancer mortality in male smokers ages 45-80 years, screened versus unscreened. Estimates of the potential reduction in mortality and cost of screening are applied. The outcomes of the model include deaths avoided, life years gained, net costs, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS. The base analysis (mortality reduction of 18%) estimates that nearly 3000 deaths would be avoided in a population of 100,000 male smokers age 40-80 years, at a cost-effectiveness of $9000 per undiscounted life year gained. A program resulting in only 6% mortality reduction would increase the ratio to $25,000 per undiscounted life years gained. CONCLUSIONS. If further examination of lung cancer screening supports its effectiveness, the results of this model suggest that implementation would be economically efficient. (C) 2000 American Cancer Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Caro, J. J., Klittich, W. S., & Strauss, G. (2000). Could chest X-ray screening for lung cancer be cost-effective? In Cancer (Vol. 89, pp. 2502–2505). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2502::aid-cncr32>3.0.co;2-n

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free