Migration ‐ why doesn't it work for deep continental data?

65Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Summary. Conventional migration of deep seismic reflection data often produces disappointingly poor results even when the original unmigrated data are of high quality and are relatively noise free. Surprisingly, deep data often subjectively appear to be best migrated at velocities which are up to 50% less than appropriate interval velocities derived from crustal refraction experiments or directly from stacking velocities. The explanation for this behaviour is that near surface features distort and attenuate the seismic wave field and produce apparent discontinuities in deep reflections. Since these discontinuities are spurious they are not associated with the appropriate large diffractions which real discontinuities at depth would produce. During the process of migration reflections are invented in order to cancel out the missing diffractions thereby producing a “smiley” section which appears overmigrated. Since the lateral extent of individual smiles increases with increasing migration velocity, increasing two‐way‐time, and increasing seismic wavelength, the effect” is almost unnoticeable on conventional shallow seismic data but is overwhelming for deep crustal data. Copyright © 1987, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warner, M. (1987). Migration ‐ why doesn’t it work for deep continental data? Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 89(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1987.tb04382.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free