Policy Utopias for Nutrient Credit Trading Programs with Nonpoint Sources

26Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A promising program to address water contamination from nutrients is water quality trading (WQT), whereby entities with high abatement costs purchase credits from entities with lower abatement costs. The concept has found some success with point source water pollution, but very few trades have occurred in over 50 programs in the United States (U.S.) that have focused on nonpoint sources (NPSs). To understand why success has been slow, we identified three environments needed for programs to succeed: physical, economic, and institutional. We estimate that only 5% of watersheds in the U.S. currently listed as nutrient impaired provide a viable physical environment for trading nitrogen; 13% are suitable for phosphorus. Economic and institutional challenges would shrink that domain even further. Therefore, we find places with the ideal physical, economic, and institutional environments necessary for feasible WQT programs are virtual policy utopias — rare places with ideal environments. Fortunately, a growing literature provides the tools necessary to identify where these policy utopias are and to expand that domain through a better understanding about how to manage WQT programs more effectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoag, D. L. K., Arabi, M., Osmond, D., Ribaudo, M., Motallebi, M., & Tasdighi, A. (2017). Policy Utopias for Nutrient Credit Trading Programs with Nonpoint Sources. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 53(3), 514–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12532

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free