Presence of crystals is not an evidence of absence of infection

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Acute monoarthritis is one of the most common rheumatologic presentations. However, it is clinically difficult to distinguish between an inflamed joint due to crystal-induced arthritis and an inflamed joint due to septic arthritis. Arthrocentesis and synovial fluid analysis are used to differentiate between these 2 conditions. The presence of crystals and positive synovial fluid culture confirm the diagnosis of crystal-induced arthritis and septic arthritis, respectively. Although uncommon, these 2 arthritides can coexist, and presence of crystal does not exclude bacterial arthritis. We reported a case of 85-year-old woman whose synovial fluid contained crystals and was initially diagnosed with crystal-induced arthritis. However, her joint fluid culture subsequently grew Staphylococcus aureus, and she was treated with arthroscopic debridement and antibiotics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ungprasert, P., Kaewpoowat, Q., Ratapano, S., Srivali, N., & Bischof, E. F. (2013). Presence of crystals is not an evidence of absence of infection. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 31(2), 455.e1-455.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2012.07.020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free