Variability of "Reported Fetal Fraction" in Noninvasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS)

17Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fetal fraction is often used to designate no-calls in noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS). We wished to compare the variability in determining fetal fraction to gold standard methods. METHODS: We identified 6 publications with datasets consisting of methods capable of measuring fetal fraction for all samples that also had comparison data from gold standard methods. Examples of gold standard methods included relative Y-chromosome quantification in cases of male fetus pregnancies or relative quantification of the relevant chromosome for pregnancies affected by one of the 3 major trisomies. RESULTS: The studies showed that the differences of the various fetal fraction measurement assays as compared to a gold standard measurement displayed a standard deviation (SD) in the range of 1.3-3.4% fetal fraction (FF). The 4 studies that measured FF from fragment size and genomic coordinates or single nucleotide polymorphisms had a lower variability, with a median SD of about 1.6%, whereas 2 other studies using different methods displayed significantly higher variability. CONCLUSION: When deciding whether to use the reported FF as a reason to discard samples as no-calls or not, we recommend taking the variability of the FF measurement into consideration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Persson, F., & Prensky, L. (2021). Variability of “Reported Fetal Fraction” in Noninvasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS). Clinical Chemistry, 67(6), 863–866. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvab014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free