Ambiguities in conchostracan biostratigraphy: A case study of the permian-triassic boandary

10Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, conchostracan biostratigraphy has become a popular tool for the recognition of the Permian-Triassic boandary and for the chronostratigraphic subdivision of the Triassic in intracontinental settings, including also the bone-bearing Keuper strata of Poland. The ambiguous nature of the new bio-chronostratigraphic approach was characterized in a case study of the Permlan-Trias tic boandary interval. The most important problems were: (1) the lack of documentation of the index species, (2) the indirect correlation with the conodont stratigraphy in marine reference sections through the sporomorph spectra, (3) the lack of definition and documentation of supporting palynologic zones, and (4) difficulties in reliable taxonomic determination of Conchostraca. Testing and, if necessary, revision of the zonation by several independent research groups is suggested.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Becker, A. (2015). Ambiguities in conchostracan biostratigraphy: A case study of the permian-triassic boandary. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 85(4), 697–701. https://doi.org/10.14241/asgp.2015.035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free