Evaluating the effect of flow and interface type on pressures delivered with bubble CPAP in a simulated model

30Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bubble CPAP, used for spontaneously breathing infants to avoid intubation or postextubation support, can be delivered with different interface types. This study compared the effect that interfaces had on CPAP delivery. We hypothesized that there would be no difference between set and measured levels between interface types. METHODS: A validated preterm infant nasal airway model was attached to the ASL 5000 breathing simulator. The simulator was programmed to deliver active breathing of a surfactant-deficient premature infant with breathing frequency at 70 breaths/min inspiratory time of 0.30 s, resistance of 150 cm H2O/L/s, compliance of 0.5 mL/cm H2O, tidal volume of 5 mL, and esophageal pressure of -10 cm H2O. Nasal CPAP prongs, size 4030, newborn and infant RAM cannulas were connected to a nasal airway model and a bubble CPAP system. CPAP levels were set at 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 cm H2O with flows of 6, 8, and 10 L/min each. Measurements were recorded after 1 min of stabilization. The analysis was performed using SAS 9.4. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test assessed normality of the data. The Friedman test was used to compare non-normally distributed repeated measures. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to conduct post hoc analysis. All tests were 2-sided, and P values of

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bailes, S. A., Firestone, K. S., Dunn, D. K., McNinch, N. L., Brown, M. F., & Volsko, T. A. (2016). Evaluating the effect of flow and interface type on pressures delivered with bubble CPAP in a simulated model. Respiratory Care, 61(3), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04251

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free