Efficacy on renal function of early conversion from cyclosporine to sirolimus 3 months after renal transplantation: Concept study

248Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sirolimus (SRL) allows to minimize the use of cyclosporine (CsA), but de novo administration after transplantation is associated with various complications. We report a prospective, open-label, multicenter randomized study to evaluate conversion from a CsA-based regimen to a SRL-based regimen 3 months after transplantation. One hundred ninety-two of a total of 237 patients were eligible at 3 months to be converted to SRL (n = 95) or to continue CsA (n = 97). All patients were also given mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and oral steroids, planned to be discontinued at month 8. The primary endpoint, the clearance estimated according to Cockcroft and Gault at week 52, was significantly better in the SRL group (68.9 vs. 64.4 mL/min, p = 0.017). Patient and graft survival were not statistically different. The incidence of acute rejection episodes, mainly occurring after withdrawal of steroids, was numerically but not statistically higher in the SRL group (17% vs. 8%, p = 0.071). Sixteen patients discontinued SRL, mainly for adverse events (n = 11), and seven patients discontinued CsA for renal failure or acute rejection. Significantly, more patients in the SRL group reported aphthous, diarrhea, acne and high triglyceride levels. Conversion CsA to SRL 3 months after transplantation combined with MMF is associated with improvement in renal function. © 2009 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lebranchu, Y., Thierry, A., Toupance, O., Westeel, P. F., Etienne, I., Thervet, E., … De Ligny, B. H. (2009). Efficacy on renal function of early conversion from cyclosporine to sirolimus 3 months after renal transplantation: Concept study. American Journal of Transplantation, 9(5), 1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02615.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free