How we know what we think

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Assuming that knowledge of our own beliefs is usually epistemically and psychologically immediate a natural question is: how is such immediate self-knowledge possible? I examine and criticize Richard Moran's response to this question and develop a different account. My alternative draws on the idea that immediate self-knowledge results from the operation of a sub-personal monitoring mechanism. I express doubts about the extent to which knowledge of our own beliefs is immediate, and suggest that some versions of the immediacy intuition rest on a confusion between belief and judgement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cassam, Q. (2010). How we know what we think. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale. Presses Universitaires de France, Departement des Revues. https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.104.0553

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free