Sedation following cardiac surgery: Evaluation of alfentanil and morphine in the presence of a computerized closed loop arterial pressure controller

3Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Forty patients who had undergone coronary artery graft surgery and who required vasodilator therapy for postoperative hypertension were given infusions of either alfentanil or morphine together with bolus doses of midazolam for sedation and analgesia while ventilation was controlled artificially. Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) was administered to both groups using a computer-controlled closed loop system which adjusted the infusion rate to maintain a preset target arterial pressure. Target pressure±5, 10, 15 and 20 mm Hg was maintained longer in the group receiving alfentanil. This group also required less SNP per hour. No difference was noted between the groups in the time taken to regain spontaneous ventilation and to extubation of the trachea, although the alfentanil group tended to be sedated more deeply during the infusion. The main advantage of alfentanil over morphine at doses used in this study was its superior ability to attenuate hypertensive responses to noxious stimuli, providing improved haemodynamic stability. © 1988 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mcmenemin, I. M., Church, J. A., & Kenny, G. N. C. (1988). Sedation following cardiac surgery: Evaluation of alfentanil and morphine in the presence of a computerized closed loop arterial pressure controller. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 61(6), 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/61.6.669

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free