The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice. Part 2, early failure

14Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate Class V restorations placed by UK general practitioners comparing those failing or surviving after two years, and to identify factors associated with early failure. Design: Prospective longitudinal cohort multi-centre study. Setting: UK general dental practices. Materials & methods: Ten dentists each placed 100 Class V restorations and recorded selected clinical information at placement and recall visits. Univariate associations were assessed between recorded clinical factors and whether restorations had failed or not at two years. Multi-variable binary logistic regression was also undertaken to identify which combination of factors had a significant effect on the probability of early failure. Results: At two years, 156 of 989 restorations had failed (15.8%), with 40 (4%) lost to follow-up. Univariate analysis showed a significant association between restoration failure and increasing patient age, payment method, the treating practitioner, non-carious cavities, cavities involving enamel and dentine, cavity preparation and restoration material. Multi-variable analysis indicated a higher probability of early failure associated with the practitioner, older patients, glass ionomer and flowable composite, bur-preparation and moisture contamination. Conclusions: Among these practitioners, both analytic methods identified significant associations between early failure of Class V restorations and the practitioner, cavity preparation method, restoration material and patient's age. © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stewardson, D. A., Thornley, P., Bigg, T., Bromage, C., Browne, A., Cottam, D., … Burke, T. (2011). The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice. Part 2, early failure. British Dental Journal, 210(11). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.430

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free