Nivolumab monotherapy in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC): Updated efficacy by subgroups and safety results from the CheckMate 032 study

  • Rosenberg J
  • Bono P
  • Kim J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Nivolumab has shown promising efficacy and acceptable safety in an open‐label, multicenter phase I/II study in patients ( pts) with mUC after ≥1 prior platinum‐based therapy (NCT01928394). Here we report updated efficacy and safety results for the overall population based on additional follow‐up and outcomes by differing levels of PD‐L1 expression. Methods: Pts with mUC, unselected by PD‐L1 expression status, received nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 wk until progression or discontinuation. Pts who met protocol criteria could continue treatment beyond progression and cross over to nivolumab + ipilimumab. Tumor PD‐L1 membrane expression was assessed with Dako PD‐L1 immunohistochemical staining. Primary endpoint: objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1); other endpoints: safety, progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response. Results: Of 78 treated pts (median age 65.5 years; range, 31‐85), 52 received ≥2 prior therapies. At a minimum follow‐up of 9 months, 23.1% of pts are on monotherapy and 23.1% switched to combination. Treatment discontinuation was mainly due to disease progression. PD‐L1 was evaluable in 67 pts (86%). Table shows overall efficacy. In pts with PD‐L1 expression ≥1% (n = 25) vs <1% (n = 42), ORR was 24% (95% CI, 9.4‐ 45.1) vs 26.2% (13.9‐42.0); median PFS, 5.5 mo (95% CI, 1.4‐11.2) vs 2.8 mo (1.4‐6.5). Grade 3 or 4 treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 21.8% of pts; most frequent were ↑ lipase (5.1%), ↑ amylase (3.8%) and fatigue, ↓ neutrophils, rash, ↓ lymphocyte and dyspnea (2.6% each); grade 5 TRAEs occurred in 2.6% (pneumonitis and thrombocytopenia, 1 each). OS by PD‐L1 expression and additional subgroup analyses will be presented. Conclusions: Nivolumab showed encouraging efficacy and acceptable safety regardless of PD‐L1 expression in previously treated, unselected pts with mUC. (Table Presented).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosenberg, J. E., Bono, P., Kim, J., Spiliopoulou, P., Calvo, E., Pillai, R., … Sharma, P. (2016). Nivolumab monotherapy in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC): Updated efficacy by subgroups and safety results from the CheckMate 032 study. Annals of Oncology, 27, vi271. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw373.12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free