Pandemic vaccine trials: expedite, but don’t rush

5Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It has been proposed that the urgency of having a vaccine as a response to SARS-CoV-2 is so great, given the potential health, economic and social benefits that we should override the established steps in the research development process. In this article I argue that whilst there are some opportunities to expedite the production of a vaccine, it is a mistake to rush the research. We should retain the existing structures represented by clear and separate ‘phasing’ of trials. I offer three reasons for this view: the existing phases of trials is morally significant; rushing fails to appropriately weigh all of the relevant risks and benefits and consent is not sufficient for the justification of additional risk. Vaccines have played a central role in global health improvements and we should not endanger such achievements for an apparent short-term gain in response to a pandemic such as SARS-CoV-2.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dawson, A. (2020). Pandemic vaccine trials: expedite, but don’t rush. Research Ethics, 16(3–4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120943730

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free