Friendly IVF: Patient opinions

Abstract

Background: The present trend towards low stimulation protocols in IVF calls for evaluation of patient attitudes. Methods: This study compared results of a 23-item questionnaire mailed to 167 patients receiving a low stimulation type of regimen (LS-IVF) (unstimulated cycle or clomiphene) and to 116 patients treated by a standard protocol (S-IVF) (long-down regulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue and FSH or human menopausal gonadotrophin). Results: Around two-thirds of all responders in both groups deemed side-effects important, but side-effects and stress associated with hormone treatment were more prevalent in patients receiving S-IVF than LS-IVF. Stress due to cycle cancellation was acceptable, mild or not perceptible in significantly (P < 0.005) more patients receiving LS-IVF [48% (36/75)] compared with patients having S-IVF [26% (8/31)]. Of patients having tried the LS-IVF protocol, 93% (125/135) would suggest either LS-IVF or a sequence of this and S-IVF as a future treatment 'package' compared with only 53% (33/63) in the S-IVF group (X2 = 43.08, P < 0.0001). The LS-IVF group showed a significant trend towards acceptance of higher number of treatment cycles. Conclusions: The patients seemed to prefer the simplicity and short duration of a low stimulation regimen in spite of drawbacks such as a high risk of cycle cancellations and accordingly the necessity for more treatment cycles.