The Stratification of Universities Revisited: Status, Followers, and the Shape of National Hierarchies

8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is generally accepted that Canadian universities are less stratified than their southern neighbours, a hypothesis popularized in the mid-2000s and verified by subsequent comparative empirical research. Through this piece, we revisit the Canadian “flatness” hypothesis, embracing a more sociological definition of status hierarchies and using social media followers as a focal proxy for status. Despite our theoretically based skepticism, adoption of an alternative status proxy, and use of more recent data, our analyses validate the flatness hypothesis. We theorize the implications of these findings, and our novel approach, for the study of organizational stratification in higher education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pizarro Milian, R., & Zarifa, D. (2023). The Stratification of Universities Revisited: Status, Followers, and the Shape of National Hierarchies. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 53(2), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v53i2.189881

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free