Nebulized Budesonide in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD): A Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Controlled, Multicenter Tria

  • Zheng J
  • Lin J
  • Zhou X
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nebulized glucocorticoids therapy for AECOPD, with systemic administration of glucocorticoids and placebo as control. METHODS: This was a multi-center, randomized, double blind, double dummy and parallel controlled trial. AECOPD patients were randomly assigned into BUD group (n=53, nebulized budesonide 2mg/4ml, q6h and normal saline (NS) 10ml iv qd or MP group (n=54, methylprednisolone 40mg, iv and nebulized NS 4ml q6h, or placebo group (n=46, nebulized NS 4ml q6h and NS 10ml iv qd) for 7 days. RESULTS: The number of withdraw rate due to treatment failair was significantly higher in placebo group than in BUD and MP groups (p=0.005). The average improvement of FEV1 after 72 hours of treatment in the BUD group and MP group were 140ml (increased 22.9% from baseline) and 190 ml (25.7%), respectively, which were significantly higher than in the placebo group 110ml (15.2%). 7 days after treatment, FEV1 improvement in the BUD group (230ml, 33.3%) was the greatest among the 3 groups. Shortness of breath was significantly alleviated in all of the 3 groups, with better improvement in the BUD group and the MP group than in the placebo group (p<0.05). Use of rescue medication and systemic glucocorticoids, and number of hospitalization days were similar among the 3 groups. The incidence of adverse events of the 3 groups were 11.3%, 8.9% and 10.9%. 10.4% of the patients in the BUD group experienced blood glucose elevation, and 6.5% of the patients in the MP group had the same experience. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized glucocorticoids and intravenous glucocorticoids were better than placebo in improving pulmonary function and releasing shortness of breath. Though the percentage of adverse events in the 3 groups remained similar, further investigation to the effect of both corticosteriod therapies on blood glucose is necessary. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nebulized glucocorticoids therapy could be an option for the treatment of AECOPD. It was as effective as sytematic administration of corticosteriods. DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Jinping Zheng, Jiangtao Lin, Xin Zhou, Shaoguang Huang, Canmao Xie, Zongan Liang, Kaisheng Yin, Wenbing Xu, Jia He, Nanshan Zhong.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zheng, J., Lin, J., Zhou, X., Huang, S., Xie, C., Liang, Z., … Zhong, N. (2011). Nebulized Budesonide in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD): A Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Controlled, Multicenter Tria. Chest, 140(4), 526A. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.1113920

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free