Risk of serious toxicity in 1181 patients treated in phase I clinical trials of predominantly targeted anticancer drugs: The M. D. anderson cancer center experience

16Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This study assessed toxicity in advanced cancer patients treated in a phase I clinic that focuses on targeted agents. Patients and methods: An analysis of database records of 1181 consecutive patients with advanced cancer who were treated in the phase I program starting 1 January 2006 was carried out. Results: All patients were treated on at least 1 of the 82 phase I clinical trials. Overall, 56 trials (68.3%) had only targeted agents, 13 (15.9%) only cytotoxics, and 13 (15.9%) targeted and cytotoxic agents. Rates of grade 3 and 4 toxicity that were at least possibly drug related were 7.1% and 3.2%, respectively, and 5 of the 1181 patients (0.4%) died from toxicity that was at least possibly drug related. The most common grade 3 or more toxic effects were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, dehydration, infection, altered mental status, bleeding, vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status greater than zero and use of a cytotoxic agent were selected as independent factors associated with serious toxicity. Conclusion: Phase I trials of primarily targeted agents showed low rates of toxicity, with 10.3% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 toxicity and a 0.4% rate of death, at least possibly drug related. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wheler, J. J., Tsimberidou, A. M., Hong, D. S., Naing, A., Falchook, G. S., Fu, S., … Kurzrock, R. (2012). Risk of serious toxicity in 1181 patients treated in phase I clinical trials of predominantly targeted anticancer drugs: The M. D. anderson cancer center experience. Annals of Oncology, 23(8), 1963–1967. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free