Pivotal contemporary trials of percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting: A surgical perspective

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are the two revascularization strategies for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). While CABG continues to be the gold standard for revascularization, advancements in PCI technology have triggered numerous, often industry-funded investigations to challenge this role. This perspective will provide a summary of previous RCTs comparing CABG vs. PCI. The recently published NOBLE and EXCEL trials will be discussed in depth. Future directions of research pertaining to CABG vs. PCI will be briefly discussed in this document.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ngu, J. M. C., Sun, L. Y., & Ruel, M. (2018). Pivotal contemporary trials of percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting: A surgical perspective. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 7(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2018.05.12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free