Will benchtop sequencers resolve the sequencing trade-off in plant genetics?

2Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An important experimental design consideration in plant genetics is the trade-off between number of individuals and number of loci that can be genotyped (Davey et al., 2011). For any given study, an investigator must choose how they partition research effort and resources, with the generation of many loci usually coming at the expense of many individuals, and vice versa. For example, for parentage and paternity analysis it is usually more important to sample many individuals (e.g., Andrew et al., 2013), while for comparative genome evolution the emphasis is firmly placed on recovering more loci (Figure 1). This trade-off still exits despite the plummeting costs of sequence data, with researchers having to decide the number of individuals feasible for a given sequencing strategy, and how the libraries will be multiplexed across lanes of a next generation sequencing (NGS) platform (Shen et al., 2011).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Twyford, A. D. (2016). Will benchtop sequencers resolve the sequencing trade-off in plant genetics? Frontiers in Plant Science, 7(APR2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00433

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free