Risk factors for cutaneous human papillomavirus seroreactivity among patients undergoing skin cancer screening in Florida

24Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the risk factors for cutaneous human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Methods: To investigate factors associated with cutaneous HPV seropositivity, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 411 patients undergoing routine skin cancer screening examinations. Serum antibodies were measured and evaluated for 36 cutaneous HPV types in the genera alpha, beta, gamma, mu, and nu. Associations of demographic and lifestyle factors with cutaneous HPV seropositivity were estimated using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals calculated using logistic regression. Results: The seroprevalence of ≥1 cutaneous HPV type was 96% and 90% for men and women, respectively. Seroprevalence was highest for HPV types 4 (46%), 1 (37%), and 8 (31%) in men and for types 4 (47%), 63 (34%), and 1 (33%) in women. Independent associations of demographic and skin cancer risk factors with genusspecific HPV seropositivity differed by sex. For example, white skin, inability to tan, and lifetime residency in Florida were factors associated with genus-specific HPV seropositivity in men. Heavy smoking, sunscreen use, and green eye color were associated with genus-specific HPV seropositivity in women. Conclusions: Seroreactivity to cutaneous HPV types was highly prevalent in our study population. Different risk factors were independently associated with genus-specific cutaneous HPV seropositivity in men and women. © 2010 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iannacone, M. R., Michael, K. M., Giuliano, A. R., Waterboer, T., Pawlita, M., & Rollison, D. E. (2010). Risk factors for cutaneous human papillomavirus seroreactivity among patients undergoing skin cancer screening in Florida. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 201(5), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1086/650466

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free