Neutrophilic inflammation in sputum or blood does not define a clinically distinct asthma phenotype in ATLANTIS

Abstract

Introduction Neutrophilic asthma has been suggested to be a clinically distinct phenotype characterised by more severe airflow obstruction and higher exacerbation risk. However, this has only been assessed in few and smaller studies, using different cut-offs to define neutrophilia, and with conflicting results. We used data from ATLANTIS, an observational longitudinal study including a large number of patients with asthma and healthy controls. The aim of the present study was to examine whether neutrophilic inflammation, either in sputum or blood, is more prevalent in asthma and whether it correlates with disease severity. Methods ATLANTIS included 773 asthma patients, with blood collected from 767 (99%) and sputum from 228 patients (30%). Data were available from 244 healthy controls, all providing blood and 126 (52%) providing sputum. Asthma patients were characterised, including parameters of large and small airways disease at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Sputum and blood neutrophilia were defined as values exceeding the upper quartile in asthma patients. Results The prevalence of sputum neutrophilia did not differ between asthma patients and healthy controls. Asthma patients with sputum neutrophilia did not display more severe symptoms, large or small airways disease or more frequent exacerbations. Blood neutrophilia was more common in asthma and was associated with higher body mass index, female sex, current smoking and systemic corticosteroid use. Patients with blood neutrophilia had a statistically significant, but small, increase in residual volume/total lung capacity. Blood neutrophilia was not associated with large or small airways disease or exacerbation risk. Conclusion Sputum and blood neutrophilia do not define a distinct clinical phenotype in asthma.