Comparing Visual Scoring of Lung Injury with a Quantifying AI-Based Scoring in Patients with COVID-19

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Fast diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the detection of high-risk patients are crucial but challenging in the pandemic outbreak. The aim of this study was to evaluate if deep learning-based software correlates well with the generally accepted visual-based scoring for quantification of the lung injury to help radiologist in triage and monitoring of COVID-19 patients. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, the lobar analysis of lung opacities (% opacities) by means of a prototype deep learning artificial intelligence (AI)-based software was compared to visual scoring. The visual scoring system used five categories (0: 0%, 1: 0-5%, 2: 5-25%, 3: 25-50%, 4: 50-75% and 5: >75% involvement). The total visual lung injury was obtained by the sum of the estimated grade of involvement of each lobe and divided by five. Results: The dataset consisted of 182 consecutive confirmed COVID-19 positive patients with a median age of 65 ± 16 years, including 110 (60%) men and 72 (40%) women. There was a correlation coefficient of 0.89 (p < 0.001) between the visual and the AI-based estimates of the severity of lung injury. Conclusion: The study indicates a very good correlation between the visual scoring and AI-based estimates of lung injury in COVID-19.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Biebau, C., Dubbeldam, A., Cockmartin, L., Coudyzer, W., Coolen, J., Verschakelen, J., & Wever, W. D. (2021). Comparing Visual Scoring of Lung Injury with a Quantifying AI-Based Scoring in Patients with COVID-19. Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology, 105(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/JBSR.2330

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free