Comparison of hydraulic and conventional tensile strength tests

21Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Tensile strength is paramount for reliable simulation of hydraulic fracturing experiments on all scales. Tensile strength values depend strongly on the test method. Three different laboratory tests for tensile strength of rocks are compared. Test methods employed are the Brazilian disc test (BDT), modified tension test (MTT) and hydraulic fracturing experiments with hollow cylinders (MF = Mini Frac). Lithologies tested are a micritic limestone, a coarse-grained marble, a fine-grained Ruhrsandstone, a medium-grained rhyolite, a medium- /coarse-grained andesite and a medium grained sandstone. Test results reveal a relationship between the area under tensile stress at failure and the measured tensile strength. This relationship becomes visible when the area under tensile strength ranges over one order of magnitude from 450 to 4624 mm 2 . This observation becomes relevant when selecting the tensile strength values of lithologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Molenda, M., Stöckhert, F., Brenne, S., & Alber, M. (2013). Comparison of hydraulic and conventional tensile strength tests. In ISRM International Conference for Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing 2013 (pp. 981–992). International Society for Rock Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.5772/56300

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free