Comparing Churn Prediction Techniques and Assessing Their Performance: A Contingent Perspective

41Citations
Citations of this article
177Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Customer retention has become a focal priority. However, the process of implementing an effective retention campaign is complex and dependent on firms’ ability to accurately identify both at-risk customers and those worth retaining. Drawing on empirical and simulated data from two online retailers, we evaluate the performance of several parametric and nonparametric churn prediction techniques, in order to identify the optimal modeling approach, dependent on context. Results show that under most circumstances (i.e., varying sample sizes, purchase frequencies, and churn ratios), the boosting technique, a nonparametric method, delivers superior predictability. Furthermore, in cases/contexts where churn is more rare, logistic regression prevails. Finally, where the size of the customer base is very small, parametric probability models outperform other techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tamaddoni, A., Stakhovych, S., & Ewing, M. (2016). Comparing Churn Prediction Techniques and Assessing Their Performance: A Contingent Perspective. Journal of Service Research, 19(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670515616376

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free