Citizen Science and Natural Resource Management: A Social Network Analysis of Two Community-Based Water Monitoring Programs

6Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In natural resource management contexts, citizen science programs often involve a diversity of actors collaborating in broad social networks. However, the characteristics and functioning of these networks has received limited attention. In this article, we demonstrate the benefits of applying social network research to citizen science practice. Through a mixed methods approach, we compare data sharing and collaboration networks of two community-based water monitoring programs in Australia. The quantitative component revealed that despite similarities in actor diversity and activities, both programs have created divergent network structures (centralized vs decentralized) corresponding to their scale of influence in environmental decision-making (regional vs local impacts). The qualitative component showed how individuals navigated their relationships and managed key tensions inherent to network functioning. This study provides new insights on the role of social networks in citizen science and concludes by recommending program leaders adopt a “networking mindset” to maximize their sphere of influence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bonney, P. R., Hansen, B. D., & Baldwin, C. (2023). Citizen Science and Natural Resource Management: A Social Network Analysis of Two Community-Based Water Monitoring Programs. Society and Natural Resources, 36(6), 600–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2183445

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free