Democratising AI: Multiple Meanings, Goals, and Methods

35Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Numerous parties are calling for "the democratisation of AI", but the phrase is used to refer to a variety of goals, the pursuit of which sometimes conflict. This paper identifies four kinds of "AI democratisation"that are commonly discussed: (1) the democratisation of AI use, (2) the democratisation of AI development, (3) the democratisation of AI profits, and (4) the democratisation of AI governance. Numerous goals and methods of achieving each form of democratisation are discussed. The main takeaway from this paper is that AI democratisation is a multifarious and sometimes conflicting concept that should not be conflated with improving AI accessibility. If we want to move beyond ambiguous commitments to "democratising AI", to productive discussions of concrete policies and trade-offs, then we need to recognise the principal role of the democratisation of AI governance in navigating tradeoffs and risks across decisions around use, development, and profits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seger, E., Ovadya, A., Siddarth, D., Garfinkel, B., & Dafoe, A. (2023). Democratising AI: Multiple Meanings, Goals, and Methods. In AIES 2023 - Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 715–722). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3600211.3604693

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free