Accurate Blood Flow Measurements: Are Artificial Tracers Necessary?

49Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Imaging-based blood flow measurement techniques, such as particle image velocimetry, have become an important tool in cardiovascular research. They provide quantitative information about blood flow, which benefits applications ranging from developmental biology to tumor perfusion studies. Studies using these methods can be classified based on whether they use artificial tracers or red blood cells to visualize the fluid motion. We here present the first direct comparison in vivo of both methods. For high magnification cases, the experiments using red blood cells strongly underestimate the flow (up to 50% in the present case), as compared to the tracer results. For medium magnification cases, the results from both methods are indistinguishable as they give the same underestimation of the real velocities (approximately 33%, based on in vitro reference measurements). These results suggest that flow characteristics reported in literature cannot be compared without a careful evaluation of the imaging characteristics. A method to predict the expected flow averaging behavior for a particular facility is presented. © 2012 Poelma et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poelma, C., Kloosterman, A., Hierck, B. P., & Westerweel, J. (2012). Accurate Blood Flow Measurements: Are Artificial Tracers Necessary? PLoS ONE, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045247

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free