Contractual arrangements for financing and managing African protected areas: Insights from three case studies

8Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Protected areas and conservation are inadequately funded throughout the world, especially in Africa. In response to this challenge, 'innovative financial mechanisms' are meant to make use of markets and contractual arrangements to provide for additional and secured funding. The use of these instruments within nature conservation has increased in recent years. Proponents of these instruments argue that they may soon fill the funding gap. Critics warn that such instruments may favour market priorities, which could undervalue the overall conservation goals. This paper analyses the practical functioning of three cases of innovative financial mechanisms for African protected areas. It draws insights about their potential replication, with respect to their contractual design, their associated impacts and success factors, as well as the challenges encountered. The paper argues that these contractual approaches critically depend on enforcing conditionalities, maintaining long-term relations through intermediary organizations, as well as finding champions and building capacities. Challenges to be assessed in the future include the variability of markets and the significance of transaction costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lapeyre, R., & Laurans, Y. (2017). Contractual arrangements for financing and managing African protected areas: Insights from three case studies. Parks, 23(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.PARKS-23-1RL.en

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free