Minimal Clinically Important Differences for a Weight Distribution Platform in Dogs with Osteoarthritis

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this retrospective study to determine the optimal method of evaluating static weight-bearing distribution to assess response to treatment in dogs with osteoarthritis using a weight distribution platform, data from the Clinica Veterinária de Cães (Portuguese Republican National Guard) clinical records were extracted. At baseline and at 15 days post-treatment, follow-up data from 80 dogs treated for bilateral hip osteoarthritis were categorized based on an anchor question. Estimates of minimal clinically important differences were calculated with distribution-based and anchor-based methods for deviation from normal weight-bearing and a symmetry index (SI). For deviation, the anchor-based methods provided a range from −0.3 to −3.1, and the distribution-based methods from 0.16 to 0.29. For SI, the anchor-based methods provided a range from −10.0 to −23.9, and the distribution-based methods from 1.31 to 2.88. Receiver operator characteristic curves provided areas under the curve >0.7, indicating an acceptable cut-off point. We presented estimates of −1 for deviation and −10 for SI in dogs with OA. These estimates can be used for research and patient monitoring. Future studies should include OA from other joints and animals from a broader clinical context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alves, J. C., Santos, A., Lavrador, C., & Carreira, L. M. (2024). Minimal Clinically Important Differences for a Weight Distribution Platform in Dogs with Osteoarthritis. Animals, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14010128

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free