Genetic diversity and population structure of domestic brown trout (Salmo trutta) in France

35Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Animals in captivity are subject to similar evolutionary forces that act on natural populations, which can facilitate the generation of population genetic structure. Understanding the extent of genetic differentiation among captive populations provides insights into industry practices and the domestication process. We investigated the genetic structure of domestic brown trout (Salmo trutta) in France by surveying fish collected from 20 fish farms. Using microsatellite markers, we calculated basic measures of genetic diversity and differentiation among these various farms. We also evaluated population structure using tree-based approaches, model-based clustering methods, and ordination techniques. Differences in genetic diversity reflected founding histories and source stocks among the fish farms. Fish farms that raise trout originating from Mediterranean watersheds had lower levels of genetic diversity and much higher divergence than populations of Atlantic origin. Stocks believed to originate from the common Atlantic-based trout strain demonstrated low-levels of population structure. We observed fish of mixed ancestry in some fish farms and the presence of multiple genetic stocks within the same facility. Our findings reveal patterns of genetic structure that reflect differences in founding practices and movement of individuals and strains between fish farms. Such findings have consequences for fisheries managers stocking natural ecosystems with captive-reared fish, biologists attempting to understand the interactions between wild and domestic brown trout, and fish farmers involved in stocking or restoration activities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bohling, J., Haffray, P., & Berrebi, P. (2016). Genetic diversity and population structure of domestic brown trout (Salmo trutta) in France. Aquaculture, 462, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.04.013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free