Visual influences on auditory pluck and bow judgments

96Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the McGurk effect, visual information specifying a speaker's articulatory movements can influence auditory judgments of speech. In the present study, we attempted to find an analogue of the McGurk effect by using nonspeech stimuli-the discrepant audiovisual tokens of plucks and bows on a cello. The results of an initial experiment revealed that subjects' auditory judgments were influenced significantly by the visual pluck and bow stimuli. However, a second experiment in which speech syllables were used demonstrated that the visual influence on consonants was significantly greater than the visual influence observed for pluck-bow stimuli. This result could be interpreted to suggest that the nonspeech visual influence was not a true McGurk effect. In a third experiment, visual stimuli consisting of the words pluck and bow were found to have no influence over auditory pluck and bow judgments. This result could suggest that the nonspeech effects found in Experiment 1 were based on the audio and visual information's having an ostensive lawful relation to the specified event. These results are discussed in terms of motor-theory, ecological, and FLMP approaches to speech perception. © 1993 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saldaña, H. M., & Rosenblum, L. D. (1993). Visual influences on auditory pluck and bow judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(3), 406–416. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205276

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free