The Paperwork Reduction Act: Benefits, costs and directions for reform

6Citations
Citations of this article
254Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Congress passed the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) in 1980. Intended to ensure that the federal government carefully managed information and to reduce the burden of information collection on the American public, it has arguably failed to do either. This article uses a simple analysis of the benefits and costs of the Act to evaluate possible directions for reform. The implementation of the PRA has resulted in the misallocation of government resources. Far too much time is spent at the Office of Management and Budget and at agencies reviewing collections and soliciting input on thousands of information collections that are routine and unchanging. If this time was cut back, both OMB and agencies could devote more time to new information collections that have methodological issues and significant policy impacts. Agencies and OMB could also devote more time to tying information collection to information management as the authors of the PRA initially intended. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shapiro, S. (2013). The Paperwork Reduction Act: Benefits, costs and directions for reform. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.09.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free