Abstract
Congress passed the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) in 1980. Intended to ensure that the federal government carefully managed information and to reduce the burden of information collection on the American public, it has arguably failed to do either. This article uses a simple analysis of the benefits and costs of the Act to evaluate possible directions for reform. The implementation of the PRA has resulted in the misallocation of government resources. Far too much time is spent at the Office of Management and Budget and at agencies reviewing collections and soliciting input on thousands of information collections that are routine and unchanging. If this time was cut back, both OMB and agencies could devote more time to new information collections that have methodological issues and significant policy impacts. Agencies and OMB could also devote more time to tying information collection to information management as the authors of the PRA initially intended. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Shapiro, S. (2013). The Paperwork Reduction Act: Benefits, costs and directions for reform. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.09.002
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.